On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Corey Osgood <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Joseph Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:16:19 -0700, "Myles Watson" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Joseph Smith <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Arrh, >> >> Looks like both of the 82830 boards are broken. What do I need to do to >> > fix >> >> them? >> >> >> > Do they still break after my last two patches? I thought they were >> fixed. >> > >> I was going by Corey's last abuild log. I appologize if you have fixed >> them >> since then. > > I don't know what was going on. abuild ran fine for me. I ran it again and sure enough, it breaks. Sorry about that. > > rca/rm4100 is still broken. All you should need to do is check that all > the functions are properly declared, either by including their declarations > in a header or an extern(al) declaration. Making the change in Carl-Daniel's > patch will tell you very quickly if you got them all or not ;) > > Myles, those patches when applied with Maggi's break the amd pistachio and > dbm690t. New abuild log with all 6? patches applied. I accidentally ran it a > second time and lost the original log, so don't mind the "previously ok" > comments, those boards were actually rebuilt and succeeded once. > I didn't try with Maggi's patches because you said they broke other boards. Thanks, Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
