When we did our dbm690t, we set up a SVN server in our own server, which
everyday work was submit to. When we think the work is good enough, we send a
patch to the community. That is a little complicated, but I believe it is a
good way.
Currently the SuperIO is not only configured in Config.lb, but also is included
in cache_as_ram.c. Based on this code structure, it is difficult to make a
single switch to decide which SuperIO we are using.
Everything makes its own sense. I believe you should make up a new directory in
mainboard for each SuperIO. Anyone else?> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:25:53
-0800> From: [email protected]> To: [email protected]> CC:
[email protected]> Subject: Re: [coreboot] 690/600 Just starting out.> >
Ron,> That sounds ok. I copied over dbm690t in both the mainboard and target
directories to advantech/som-5781. I will be getting things to work in those
directories. Should I submit a non-working patch to get things started? > > The
som-5781 is com-express so the SuperIO lives on the baseboard. The developer
baseboard that I am using has an ITE chip on it whereas the release board will
have a Winbond. I don't see any way to select at configuration time which
SuperIO/Baseboard is connected. Would it make sense to implement a standard
SuperIO interface and just link against the one we want? Would there be a need
to support multiple SuperIO in the same system? Has there been any steps taken
towards doing this? Any interest other than myself?> > The release baseboard is
a custom embedded design so it doesn't really make sense to have a directory
for it. Thoughts on how to handle this?> > Thanks> Dan Lykowski> > --- On Wed,
12/31/08, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote:> > > From: ron minnich
<[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [coreboot] 690/600 Just starting out.> >
To: "Bao, Zheng" <[email protected]>> > Cc: [email protected],
[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 12:32 AM> > On
Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Bao, Zheng> > <[email protected]> wrote:> > > The
dbm690t uses S1G1 socket. The> > mainboard/amd/xxx/Config.lb should be> > >
modified to AM2.> > >> > > > That's fine for testing but, Dan, if that test
works> > let's get a> > mainboard directory set up for your new board the> >
"right" way.> > > > Thanks> > > > ron> > > > --> > coreboot mailing list:
[email protected]> > http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot> > >
> > --> coreboot mailing list: [email protected]>
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
_________________________________________________________________
News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot