On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:52:44AM -0700, Myles Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Ward Vandewege <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:39:39PM -0700, Myles Watson wrote: > >> > The rev that broke the boot was 1089 or 1090. 1089 does not build, so I > >> > can't > >> > tell for sure. 1088 boots fine. 1090 is broken. > >> > >> They might have well been the same commit because they were > >> interdependent. It was just an easier way of looking at the changes > >> for me. > >> > >> Thanks for tracking it down. Could you send me a log from 1088? > >> Hopefully we can track it down quickly. > > > > Sure, see attached. > > The biggest difference that I see is that there is no graphics device > (PCI 1.1) in the broken one. In 1088 it was found dynamically (not in > the tree), but now it isn't found at all. > > Since it was supposed to be disabled by: > /* this board does not really have vga; disable it (pci device 00:01.1) > */ > unwanted_vpci = < 80000900 0 >; > in the dts, I'm not sure why it disappeared now. > > Possible solution: > - Try it again without the unwanted_vpci line in the dts. > > I guess I don't understand why the device is gone now. I didn't think > the changes I've made would make the device disappear.
I have not tried that yet, but here's a boot log from v1108, which still does not boot but it stops in a different place now, it seems. Thanks, Ward. -- Ward Vandewege <[email protected]> Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
13.cap.gz
Description: Binary data
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
