ron minnich wrote: > I doubt the flash chips themselves know or care. They do. Look at how any LPC/FWH chip does block erase. Which block to erase depends on the address relative start of chip that is used in the block erase command.
> I am not sure why we have that test for flashbase anyway. What's it > matter? Why do we use the old value for the next value? It's a bug. I'll fix it but need to go off for a bit first. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
