On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote:
> ron minnich wrote:
>> You have to rewrite all the printk functions to be macros again.
>> It's a bit more work than changing one setting.
>
> But it shouldn't be too bad, right?
>
> Just one printk function should need changing, and only at the
> definition.


It should not be too bad. I just want to make sure that everyone on
the list understands what we are going to change.

Getting rid of the printk macro, and having all printk messages always
available, was viewed as a reform from v2. We're essentially reforming
the reform :-)

ron

--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to