Mart Raudsepp wrote: > The log level is now given with an argument, so it's trickier to > get the code excluded from the binary completely.
Maybe split it up then? (But _only_ statics within the printk code!) > Likely can coerce gcc to do that with specially crafted code. I would prefer to avoid that. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
