On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Rudolf Marek <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, >> >> With Coreboot and ACPI the interrupt gets routed to IRQ 0, even though >> I put 18 in the _PRT table. X loads more quickly, but there are >> obvious problems with text highlighting. > > > This is OK, just the PCI line reg is not initialized. Its used only when > the routing of PCI is done via 8259. Check > http://www.coreboot.org/ACPI_in_coreboot#acpi_fill_madt > > There is some pics which explains that.
Sorry to make you continually refer to the same place. I thought I understood... >> In none of the three cases can I find the IRQ listed in >> /proc/interrupts. I would have expected to see it there. > > It means that the driver is not using any interrupts Maybe you need to load > the "nvidia" proprietary module. I don't really care that it's not using the interrupt. I was just thinking that might be the problem since the factory BIOS uses IRQ 5 and Coreboot uses 18. If interrupts aren't the problem, I wonder what's causing it to fail. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
