Patrick Georgi wrote:
> Stefan and I talked about moving to using https access for svn
> only, precisely for that reason.

Sounds good to me. But maybe some will appreciate if the svn protocal
can still be used?


> I removed the renames and moves (eg. LinuxBIOSv2/util/flash_and_burn
> to ../util/flashrom to util/flashrom),
> the code resides at /trunk from the beginning instead, and the
> revisions are renumbered.

Awesome. I suggest to simply announce a date a little in advance, say
in two weeks, when the same process is done for the public repos.


//Peter

--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to