Patrick Georgi wrote: > > Sounds good to me. But maybe some will appreciate if the svn > > protocal can still be used? > Hmm.. what would that be for - really obnoxious firewalls that > filter https, but leave "random" ports alone?
It would be for users that have a working setup and are unable to communicate with their network administrators in the timeframe that we choose for making the switch to https. > > Awesome. I suggest to simply announce a date a little in advance, say > > in two weeks, when the same process is done for the public repos. > I could push the repos live "right now", but I see no reason to make > them active on svn:// and move them in 2 weeks or whenever (and > require another synchronization by users) I think "right now" is too short time for people to make neccessary changes, and catch up with the fact that we are making the change. If https+repomove do not happen at the same time I think https should come first. But the other way around is not so nice. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
