ron minnich wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > > ron minnich wrote: > >> cpu_phase1 and cpu_phase 6 (for example) > > > > Please call it cpu_phase2 instead. Then: > > are you sure? this is cpu code in stage2, phase1. Why phase2?
cpu_phase1 and cpu_phase2 was my idea. If they are indeed running completely independent of other stage2_phases. Maybe I misunderstood? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
