On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > ron minnich wrote: >> cpu_phase1 and cpu_phase 6 (for example) > > Please call it cpu_phase2 instead. Then:
now I see. You want cpu_phase6 to be called cpu_phase2? Here is why I did not. I want to leave open the possibility that hardware creates a need for other phases. However, I'm not picky on this. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
