On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Rudolf Marek <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Acked-by: Rudolf Marek <[email protected]> > > If you can explain to me why the superIO changes. For some reason the SuperIO puts the RTC at 0x400, even though it's usually at 0x70. If I put it at 0x70 the keyboard and mouse don't work :( I put it at 0x90 and corrected the size so that it wouldn't conflict with other devices. That makes Linux happy with it. It still could be a problem for Windows not to have it at 0x70.
> Also The SMM does nothing to > do with IRQ9. Get rid of SMM for now. The IRQ 9 needs to be setup for ACPI in > SB. Thats it (and perhaps it needed also an IRQ override). Sorry I must have misunderstood this again. I thought this was why I keep getting : IRQ9 nobody cared messages from Linux. It's the last thing that Linux complains about. I'm not sure what I should do so that somebody cares. > It looks fine, assuming it works for you then lets put it in. A lot of people > is > trying to get ACPI working those days. It's mostly working. > > Please note that some changes to second patch needs to be done too. For the > global acpik8_util Yes. I was trying to implement what I thought was the intent of the original. Since then I've taken out the VGA IO port regions and the DRAM region. It's a lot more complicated because I have multiple root buses. As far as I can tell the factory BIOS is also not 100% compliant with the spec, which is making it harder to see what's wrong with mine. My current state is hopefully better than what it was when I first submitted these patches, but the BSOD is the same. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
