On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Myles Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Rudolf Marek <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Here's the same line from the factory BIOS: >>> >>> 9: 0 0 0 0 >> >> Yes this how it should look like ;) >> >> >>> I wish I knew more about interrupts. I'm surprised how different the >>> routing is for interrupts between the factory BIOS and Coreboot, but >>> I've been assuming they're routed correctly. I've attached >>> /proc/interrupts from the factory BIOS. >> >> Hmm perhaps the chipset is setup differently. Question is from where the >> IRQ9 comes from.
I think it's interesting that there are no interrupt sources with that many interrupts in the factory BIOS. Maybe that's a hint? Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
