On 20.04.2009 13:41, Peter Stuge wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> Can we please keep the naming of these files consistent? >> > > Maybe think of it as migration. I think Kconfig will take a while. >
And I'd like to separate migration and include file refactoring into two separate commits. >> Right now, I can do a >> find -name "*.lb" >> and get all config and include files. If I rename the include files >> only, that will no longer work. >> > > Right, you'll have to use > > find -name '*.[lc]b' > > instead. > Correct. It's doable, but neither obvious nor documented. Some documentation for this would be really nice. That's why I want to postpone that part into another commit. >> And given that Ron wants to convert most of the stuff to real >> makefiles anyway, >> > > I want that too, but I think we will be doing many other improvements > before that one. > OK. So there will probably be some intermediary stage. >> I am not sure we want to break vendor/developer trees twice (once >> for .lb->.bc and once for real makefiles). >> > > It's a good point to not break stuff. I think it's OK to add new > things in a new way though (as long as there is a point of course). > After this patch, the tree will be mostly converted. ROM size calculation for a few boards is still not factored out because it is either unique or non-obvious. We need at least one other conversion patch for the remaining boards and I'd appreciate help with that. Can I use your Ack for an intermediary commit which has the include files in src/config/, but with the old .lb name until someone writes up a doc? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
