On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 03.05.2009 02:40, schrieb Ward Vandewege: >> >> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 04:38:12PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Ward Vandewege<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 01:42:34PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It does look like an SMP machine in which both CPUs are trying to run >>>>> as the BSP. >>>>> >>>>> Possible? >>>> >>>> It's definitely an SMP machine, two dual-core CPUs. >>> >>> So can you see what changed in the k8 north/cpu support since the last >>> time it worked? >> >> Sure. The last time it worked is r4232, I had to bisect to find the commit >> causing the problem. r4233/4234 are one changeset. >> >> src/northbridge/amd is unchanged by this changeset. >> >> The diff for src/cpu/amd is attached. > > The various copies of "copy_and_run" were merged into > src/arch/i386/lib/copy_and_run.c. > I tweaked the coreboot_apc generation a bit, by adding the serial driver and > console output code. It worked on a fam10 board here, so I didn't think it > to cause much trouble - seems like it does. > > The interleaved messages are > > (by the BSP) > malloc Enter, size 1100, free_mem_ptr 00148000 > malloc 00148000 > CPU APIC: 01 > > (by the AP) > image length = 00002a6c > Jumping to image. > > That's definitely a different image used for the AP than the one for the BSP > (see image length some lines earlier)
It didn't break my s2895 (dual dual-core K8) I wonder what the difference is. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
