On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> wrote:
> My next step is to make copy_and_run cbfs aware. That would push the > coreboot_ram part of both stages into cbfs already, significantly decreasing > the bootblock size. this is the next sensible step to make. I think I jumped a bit ahead with the XIP patch. ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
