On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:24 AM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My next step is to make copy_and_run cbfs aware. That would push the >> coreboot_ram part of both stages into cbfs already, significantly decreasing >> the bootblock size. Thanks Patrick. This sounds great.
> this is the next sensible step to make. I think I jumped a bit ahead > with the XIP patch. It sparked a good discussion and hopefully clarified where we're going. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
