Patrick Georgi wrote: > The "next" field has the disadvantage that we can't simply hot-update > anymore, as we'd have to change data (instead of merely adding it).
ron minnich wrote: > - NEXT pointer > > All of these will work. 'next' foils the desirable property that single files in cbfs can be updated in the flash chip without touching any other regions. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
