On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Myles Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ron minnich [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 4:59 PM >> To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger >> Cc: Myles Watson; coreboot >> Subject: Re: [coreboot] Resource allocator in v2 >> >> I would love to see Myle's v3 allocator move to v2. >> >> I've had a few complaints about the stage numbering/naming in v3 .... >> would you preserve that or ... > The naming is unimportant to me as long as it's clear that we: > 1. Read resources > 2. Allocate them > 3. Write them to hardware > > Last time I asked for suggestions there was no consensus on good names.
Then stick with the v2 names. Thanks ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
