> >> I've had a few complaints about the stage numbering/naming in v3 .... > >> would you preserve that or ... > > The naming is unimportant to me as long as it's clear that we: > > 1. Read resources > > 2. Allocate them > > 3. Write them to hardware > > > > Last time I asked for suggestions there was no consensus on good names. > > Then stick with the v2 names. Since v2 has one compute_allocate_resource it will become compute_resource and allocate resource then.
Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
