On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Myles Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree. Let's do that first, since it would simplify this fix. I'll > review and test. Let's see what other comments we get ... anyone out there see an issue with 32 byte character names? If you want, we can go with 40, which will size the struct up to a nice simple 64 bytes ... ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
