ron minnich wrote: > >> BTW, you can simplify the existing coreboot code a bit if you > >> add a "char filename[0];" entry to 'struct cbfs_file' - as > >> SeaBIOS does. > > The next big step in my view is setting a flash-friendly value of > zero.
I'm not sure it makes sense to try to be flash-friendly in cbfstool. I think it makes more sense to just not care until flash write time, at which point the flash writing software should understand cbfs and do the right thing<tm> for the flash chip at hand. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
