[Peter, is this amount of quoting OK or too minimal?] On 15.05.2009 17:35, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Use chipaddr_t instead of volatile uint8_t * because when we access > chips in external flashers, they are not accessed via pointers at all. >
Of course I'm open to alternative names if people dislike chipaddr_t. chipaddr or flashaddr come to mind. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
