On 16.05.2009 04:22, ron minnich wrote: > anything that doesn't in in _t. >
I hate _t as well. > flashaddr strikes me as a good name. > flashaddr sounds good. chipaddr is my favourite, though, because our accessor functions are named chip_read* and chip_write* and this would give us some naming consistency. Of course, said consistency can also be achieved by renaming the chip accessor functions to flash_read* and flash_write*. The name is a not important for me as long as we can kill volatile uint8_t * with it. :-) Do you want me to resend, and with which name? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
