On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 04:07:08AM -0400, Richard Smith wrote: > If you are going to flatten the structure then you should also probably > correct the companion chip name. The code base this was started from > was vx800 but its been modified for the vx855. At the time OLPC got the > code the mods were already made so we don't know exactly what what > changed from vx800 to vx855. > > The vx855 is a subset of the vx800. The code will probably work on a > vx800 but I'm sure there are subtle differences. Perhaps you should > rename it to be vx8xx and then start dealing with the differences when > you find them.
Sounds like a good plan, yes. If the vx855 is a subset of vx800 the differences should be minimal and a common code base should be nicely doable. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
