On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 12:51:17AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Myles Watson wrote: > > Since normal and failover aren't supported with CBFS, can they disappear > > too? > > No, we should get that back to life with CBFS asap.. it's one of > coreboot's key features..
What's the use case for normal/failover? I always envisioned it as a software implementation of a "bios savior". If so, building in a serialice shell might be a simpler solution. Am I missing an important use-case? -Kevin -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
