Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> IMHO access to CMOS before CAR is unnecessarily painful > > > > Why? > > Because you either introduce a dependency on ROMCC or you need > additional assembler code.
I love Patrick's idea about generating macros from cmos.layout. With that, the additional assembler code would amount to maybe 15 instructions. Far from painful to me. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
