On 05.10.2009 14:56, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Peter Stuge wrote: > >>> another course of action (eg. moving the tools into the coreboot v2 >>> repository, so everyone gets them), >>> >>> >> No - please don't do that. We're trying to make them separate, not >> put them back in again. >> >> >> > > For the following utilities it does not make sense to keep them separate: >
Sorry, -ENOPARSE. Are you saying they should not be separate from each other or they should not be separate from the v2 tree? > * nvramtool > * superiotool > * getpir > * mptable > * inteltool > * ectool > and maybe also for msrtool. We can put that in a separate repository, > too, if you prefer it to be not associated with coreboot directly. > I think a common coreboot-utils repo would be great, but having them in a not-checked-out-by-default-with-v2 directory in the v2 repo is absolutely OK for me. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
