On 10/08/2009 08:37 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
Stefan Reinauer wrote:

No - please don't do that. We're trying to make them separate, not
put them back in again.

For the following utilities it does not make sense to keep them
separate:

* nvramtool
* superiotool
* getpir
* mptable
* inteltool
* ectool
and maybe also for msrtool.


Ie. all that are external. :)

But.. Um, what are you proposing?



We can put that in a separate repository, too, if you prefer it to
be not associated with coreboot directly.


Hm. If there is a single util place I think that's where msrtool
should go, associated or not.. Or? But if there are several util
places I am already confused..

Was it a mistake to create trunk/util?


I think so... it did not help.. the only difference is now all those
tools are not checked out by a coreboot checkout anymore.

I believe we should svn mv coreboot-v2 coreboot-devel and svn mv util/*
coreboot-v2/util

Any acks?


Yes I like this idea.
Acked by: Joseph Smith <[email protected]>

Anyone else?


--
Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org

--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to