Myles Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, coreboot information > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Dear coreboot readers! > > This is the automatic build system of coreboot. > > The developer "myles" checked in revision 4795 to > the coreboot repository. This caused the following > changes: > > Change Log: > Revert deletion that snuck in to 4794. Sorry. > > Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Acked-by: Myles Watson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > Build Log: > Compilation of a-trend:atc-6220 has been fixed > ... > Compilation of amd:db800 is still broken > See the error log at > > http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=db800&vendor=amd&num=2 > > <http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=db800&vendor=amd&num=2> > ... > Compilation of digitallogic:msm800sev is still broken > See the error log at > > http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=msm800sev&vendor=digitallogic&num=2 > > <http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=msm800sev&vendor=digitallogic&num=2> > > These boards build for me and have 64K left in the ROM. How can there > be that big of a difference between my build system and this one?
Maybe you build them without payloads? 64k sounds quite tight for two payloads, even though it's "just" an old filo... > Anybody know why they have 128K bootblocks? It seems a little large. Can we reduce that? Patrick? Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
