Myles Watson wrote: > > > > > Anybody know why they have 128K bootblocks? It seems a little > > > > > large. > > > > > > > > Can we reduce that? Patrick? > > > > It isn't 128k. That number is not used. cbfstool adjusts the size. > > The 128K was for normal + fallback.
Ok. > Bootblock sizes are fixed, not adjusted by cbfstool. I misunderstood Patrick on IRC then. That's very possible. > > Acked-by: Peter Stuge <[email protected]> > > Thanks. Sorry I was impatient. No problem! As long as it got in. :) //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
