On 2/5/10 5:40 PM, Joseph Smith wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 11:39 AM, Patrick Georgi wrote:
>> Am 05.02.2010 17:22, schrieb Joseph Smith:
>>> yes something like CPU_CORES would be better.
>> What about MULTICORE_SUPPORT?
Or should we just re-unite it under CONFIG_SMP?

MULTICORE is about as wrong for hyperthreading as LOGICAL_CPUS

No matter what, I think the number of config variables around this area
should be reduced. Then bad names don't hurt so much.


-- 
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [email protected]http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866


-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to