On 7/8/10 8:09 PM, Myles Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Am 08.07.2010 19:50, schrieb Myles Watson: >>> BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL allows the user to use CMOS values to select which >>> image to boot. This patch: >>> >>> - makes BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL depend on USE_OPTION_TABLE >> This would prevent the "old" scheme of building a fallback image (which >> is built first) with BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL and _no_ USE_OPTION_TABLE (so it >> uses the hardcoded defaults) and a normal image with USE_OPTION_TABLE. > So I probably went too far. I should have made it depend on > HAVE_OPTION_TABLE. Even though the normal/fallback mechanism uses CMOS, it does not require an option table. Are there advantages in changing this?
Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
