On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > Stefan Reinauer wrote: >> Even though the normal/fallback mechanism uses CMOS, it does not >> require an option table. >> Are there advantages in changing this? > > One advantage would be that any use of NVRAM always implies having an > option table, which I think makes sense. Somewhere it needs to be > specified what bit(s) the mechanism uses, better in an option table > than hardcoded IMO.
That was my thought. It should be obvious when we're using/corrupting values, to minimize surprises. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
