2010/10/2 Stefan Reinauer <[email protected]> > On 10/1/10 11:27 PM, Uwe Hermann wrote: > > See patch. > > > > abuilt-tested. > > > > > > Uwe. > IMHO the patch makes it really hard to actually see what the code does. > I think Idwer was recently running into a problem where the use of > post_code would trash %eax were hard to comprehend. Now we seem have a > lot more code that comes from somewhere else and touches registers > without it being obvious to the reader of the code. >
Uwe pointed me to this errata: http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/specupdate/253176.pdf Is processor init (with or without CAR but preferably with) still possible ? The CPU that's used on the board is either a "N = Intel ® Pentium ® 4 processor" or a "R = Intel ® Pentium ® 4 processor on 90 nm process", cpuid is 0xf29. > Just my 2ct. > > Stefan > Idwer > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
