The common mtrr registers are separated into their own macros. For
instance, check out the AMD car code. AMD has additional mtrr
registers that are used. There is an AMD_MTRR_MSRS_TABLE_ENTRIES_ASM
as a result. Is this not enough to separate the vendors?

Or is your assertion that the values in
X86_MTRR_MSRS_TABLE_ENTRIES_ASM can vary?

Thanks,
wt

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:18 PM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's proven dangerous in the past to cross mtrr settings across vendors.
>
> Which is what you are doing. Then somebody patches, e.g.,
> cpu/x86/mtrr.h for some fix to via, and we find out a year later it is
> not right for some flavor of AMD. MTRRs have been a rolling headache
> for 10 years now.
>
> Sure they should all be the same. Sometimes there are weird issues.
>
> So what I'd prefer, personally: leave the settings in each vendor
> file: amd, via, whatever, don't make the common settings in
> cpu/x86/mtrr.h. But use your nice macros to set those up.
>
> ron
>

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to