the following patch was just integrated into master:
commit 96e3035a1f9f6ade63d31c4f5e6f806df609f5c1
Author: Martin Roth <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Feb 10 14:26:20 2013 -0700

    AMD SB900: fix warnings
    
    Add a prototype to a .h file
    Remove an unused file (GppHp.c) from the build by deleting it from the
      makefile. I left the file since this is vendorcode. This is the code
      for PCIe hotplug.
    Inside GppHp.c, make functions not called from outside static.
      This obviously isn't important since the file isn't used, but for
      the sake of the cleanup I thought I'd go ahead with it...
    
    This was tested with the torpedo build.
    
    This fixes these warnings:
    
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/Dispatcher.c: In function 'LocateImage':
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/Dispatcher.c:193:38: warning: cast to pointer 
from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
    
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/Usb.c:740:1: warning: no previous prototype 
for 'XhciA12Fix' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/GppHp.c:65:1: warning: no previous prototype 
for 'sbGppHotPlugSmiProcess' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/GppHp.c: In function 'sbGppHotPlugSmiProcess':
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/GppHp.c:76:5: warning: implicit declaration 
of function 'SbStall' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/GppHp.c: At top level:
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/GppHp.c:101:1: warning: no previous prototype 
for 'sbGppHotUnplugSmiProcess' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/GppHp.c:134:1: warning: no previous prototype 
for 'sbGppHotplugSmiCallback' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/GppHp.c: In function 
'sbGppHotplugSmiCallback':
    src/vendorcode/amd/cimx/sb900/GppHp.c:158:5: warning: implicit declaration 
of function 'outPort80' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    
    Change-Id: I5a1a20eeb81e1f4d59e3e3192f081e11d8506f56
    Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <[email protected]>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2349
    Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
    Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
    Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <[email protected]>

Reviewed-By: Patrick Georgi <[email protected]> at Mon Feb 11 08:25:44 
2013, giving +2
See http://review.coreboot.org/2349 for details.

-gerrit

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to