Hello Alex, I am just trying to understand the main course you guys/maintainers will take from here. It is not hard for me to tweak this what I see, and produce usable loads which work... But I am not talking about me, rather about wide community of developers which Coreboot supports.
It seems from what I see, it is very hard to use FSP concept as is: there should be a manual produced, so people, who decide to go with INTEL CPUs for their embedded development, should read it and understand in more details what should be done and why. At least. It seems to me as the only valid option for now. And yes, also mandatory unification of the methodology for all INTEL CPUs. By the way, this manual should be developed and placed in Coreboot tree. Is this activity already done? Thank you, Zoran _______ Most of The Time you should be "intel inside" to be capable to think "out of the box". -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of mrnuke Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 11:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [coreboot] INTEL FSP support coreboot-v4.0-4966 On 12/05/2013 08:44 AM, Stojsavljevic, Zoran wrote: > Hello, > [...] > Here is the question for thinking: both CC2 and EL2 choices should be > unified, to reflect one steady procedure for INTEL FSP, right? > > I sent this email not in negative connotation, just trying to understand how > better to approach Coreboot configuration procedure. Since there are more > than few paths to be selected and IDF tool to be used to generate > descriptor.bin . > > Looking forward to some suggestions (from wide auditorium) to what I wrote > here. > Well, we still consider FSP support experimental. As you might have imagined, the concept is new to us, we're still trying to wrap our heads around it. We're not even sure if we'll keep FSP in the long run, considering we have more native support for the FSP parts. As far as the configuration goes, if you start with a blank .config, and select the board you want, the defaults should be able to produce a working image. How did you think of unifying CC2 and EL2? One uses the FSP path, while the other one does not. We still keep the FSP vs non-FSP paths separate, although I think converting a board from one path to the other should be relatively simple. I would start by editing the configuration in src/mainboard/intel/<boardname>/ (Kconfig and devicetree.cb), and go from there. Alex -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052 -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
