On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:34 PM, mrnuke <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/06/2013 10:47 AM, ron minnich wrote: >> Here are my thoughts on FSP. >> >> FSP is how we deal with a bad situation: the fact that Intel chipsets >> are no longer open (the way they were until 2000 or so) and require a >> binary blob from Intel to get them working. >> > The best option is to have the FSP source under src/vendorcode/fsp. > That's also the only way people can comment on, and help improve the > API. This already happened with CIMX and AGESA.
FSP is a delivery vehicle for binary code. It is designed to be a binary blob with well-defined entry points. So, what you're saying is "the best option for delivering the binary blob is to be delivered as not a binary blob." At that point my head explodes as I try to parse the contradiction. :-) ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
