If you don't want to hear it, ignore it. We shouldn't break things just so
people with mistaken opinions are happy, nor how long it took to rearrange
things into a broken state.

Gabe


On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:14 PM, mrnuke <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12/13/2013 09:44 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> > I guess I don't understand why people feel better being able to build
> > a firmware image which will boot the CPU in a broken mode.
> >
> I have no idea either. However, what I do have is chronic fatigue from
> hearing clueless people complain and moan about having microcode in
> their coreboot.
>
> I want my time with the coreboot community to be fun. I like talking
> about silly mistakes that cost me hours or days. I like being made fun
> of when that happens. I like doing fun stuff. I like playing with
> hardware. I do NOT like litter from useless philosophical discussions
> about which blob is more acceptable than the other.
>
> I spend a few weeks now completing the change, and in exchange, I get a
> lifetime of peace on the matter. We all do. It's a win-win. The change
> will be mostly transparent to the average coreboot user.
>
> What's there not to like?
>
> Alex
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
> http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to