On 14.12.2013 07:59, ron minnich wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, mrnuke <[email protected]> wrote: > > What's the point? Why not just enlighten them? I just can not understand this. Some distros have a policy of putting free and non-free components in separate repositories (E.g Debian contrib/free vs non-free) and having appropriate dependencies to show that free package needs something non-free. I'd hate to see coreboot land in some "non-free" repo over microcode issues, it would send wrong message.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
