On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aaron Durbin wrote:
>> I skimmed through the doc yesterday evening. It looks very much like
>> BayTrail. What particular differences did you see where it would be
>> different to cause issues for coreboot?
>
> I think the most obvious thing is the message port architecture?
>
> Sure, we can skip modeling them and create some global functions for
> sending messages to random ports, but that wouldn't be very impressive..

What do you mean by modeling them? What is an impressive
implementation for sending messages to ports? It's just another
address space through index/data pairs.

-Aaron

-- 
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to