On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 07:46:50 AM ron minnich wrote: > I plan to use the intel code as as guide, but not pull it in directly. We > have source, we should do it right. I am going to take Aaron's suggestion > and structure it as baytrail is structured. > I was thinking we could put the existing code in vendorcode/, and call that from our stages. No need to make a complete rewrite, and no need to maintain a fork. Of course, this is probably easier said than done, but then we do the same for AGESA.
Alex -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
