On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Stojsavljevic, Zoran < [email protected]> wrote:
> > I really don't want to be rude here, not trying to be, but there's a lot > of talk on this issue that is driven by ignorance. And the people who know > what's going on, can't talk; the people who don't know, talk > :-) Twas ever thus. > > People who do know, in most cases do NOT want to talk (in some they > cannot), but people who do NOT know, they always talk, even they're not > asked to! > Let's be polite. After all, this is an open source community forum, the operative word being *open*. Not "open when mrnuke approves" or "open only to those with insider knowledge." Thanks for your hard work here, by the way! I would certainly like to see components of FSP open up over time, however coreboot+FSP is still a lot better than no coreboot at all in my opinion. It also seems like a logical step to help vendors take control of their platforms and see the benefits that increased transparency can bring.
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
