On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:03 AM, David Hendricks <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Stojsavljevic, Zoran > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I really don't want to be rude here, not trying to be, but there's a lot >> > of talk on this issue that is driven by ignorance. And the people who know >> > what's going on, can't talk; the people who don't know, talk >> :-) Twas ever thus. >> >> People who do know, in most cases do NOT want to talk (in some they >> cannot), but people who do NOT know, they always talk, even they're not >> asked to! > > > Let's be polite. After all, this is an open source community forum, the > operative word being open. Not "open when mrnuke approves" or "open only to > those with insider knowledge." > > Thanks for your hard work here, by the way! I would certainly like to see > components of FSP open up over time, however coreboot+FSP is still a lot > better than no coreboot at all in my opinion. It also seems like a logical > step to help vendors take control of their platforms and see the benefits > that increased transparency can bring.
Well put, David. Thank you. Marc -- http://se-eng.com -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
