On 19.01.2015 17:13, Patrick Georgi wrote: > Am 2015-01-19 12:52, schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: >> Real citation needed, not just some sentiment. For example, quite a few >> feminist blogs point to intimidating and derogatory speech/actions as >> the primary hurdles against female participation in online communities. > I have read no such reports about our community, but we did have some > (relatively minor) incidents in the past that made contributors well > less than welcome. > > I'd concentrate on solving our own issues first, over trying to fix > all the world's grievances. > > That said, I'm not sure what bucket these incidents fall into, and I'm > not sure if our list of examples of unsuitable behavior cover only > "harassment". Maybe we should replace "Harassment includes:" with > "Examples of actions we don't want to see in our community:"? > >>> and warrants the paragraph about those unacceptable behaviors. >> >> If harassment is the most common problem, that definitely warrants >> listing harassment first (which is not the case in the current CoC). > Let's just say, they're all pretty terrible? > >>>> Please define "community organizers". Did you mean "arbitration team"? >>>> Or is it the community members present at an event? >>> It isn't not meant to be specific to an arbitration team. These >>> members may >>> not be present in all cases and organizers of events and online >>> communities >>> should uphold the good standards of the community. >> >> Thanks for clarifying. The CoC would benefit from adding this >> clarification. > > http://www.coreboot.org/Talk:Code_of_Conduct is generally writable > with a Wiki account. Want to propose some language?
Thanks, I just did that. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
