On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:03:43AM -0600, Martin Roth wrote: > In regards to other approaches, instead of removing coreboot's memory > tables, would it be better if SeaBIOS updated the tables with what it had > changed instead of deleting the tables?
It's technically possible, but I don't think it's a good idea. It would be complex to do and it could lead to confusion when troubleshooting. As far as I know, only memtest86 has this problem. Is it possible to get your patch into its upstream repo? -Kevin -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
