Crazy context, what I am reading in this thread... Well! Annoying... Perception (mine) it is (do you all agree)?!
Let us involve in this discussion Mr Denk (father of U-Boot, I know Mr Denk personally)), and Mr Glass (option [B] here mentioned below)... For the (targeted by me) purposes (History involved)! Shall we? ;-) > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Alexander Couzens <lyn...@fe80.eu> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > we have two versions in the tree > [A] fsp baytrail > [B] non-fsp baytrail but with mrc.bin as meminit *(DONE by Chromium - HOW???*) Lynxis (really?!?!) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbfLYSJFdWM [Ferocious Disposition??? ;-)] Version [B] is the one, most probably, as initial architecture, U-Boot [Stefan Roese/Denx Systems] is using?! Coreboot is out of question/scope, since I see that the initial email [by Mr Roese] is NOT (anyhow) understood (well) by Coreboot designers (Peter Stuge, you do get this one, don't you... I "somehow" appreciate/your effort)! Since the following presented below is (I assume) true, if I am not mistaken. Mr Denk can oppose me (please, do not hesitate, Mr Denk - killed me few times in The Past, but...You all never know???), I am in waiting state for this one?! > pe...@stuge.se writes: > I think you are actively hurting the overall ecosystem by working on a different > project (FSP in U-Boot) which overlaps with Coreboot efforts. Peter (Stuge), This is VERY correct statement... You already mentioned: It is NOT INTEL FSP, per say? It is something I am fighting for years for/in the STRONG interests of U-Boot/Open Source: to have consistent strategy with INTEL IOTG management which they ignored/have dominant/aggressive strategy to walk over the Open Source people, people at all (please, INTEL Legal, try to oppose me.. Be my guests, make my day, I know U R watching)?! *> pe...@stuge.se <pe...@stuge.se> writes:* *> The only thing that makes sense is for U-Boot to focus on being a> payload that is started by coreboot (this has already been done) and> for your issues to be solved within the coreboot frame.* Peter (Stuge), Although I DO 100% agree with you what you did write (about U-Boot politics) in your very first email about DENX Systems (surprising, isn't it), with the *last statement* presented here do NOT agree at all!? This is a (mild per say denial) noise, my dear friend. "BS" (sorry)... To start Coreboot FSP and then to have U-Boot payload as third stage boot loader??? GOOGLE would like to have this as concept, don't you agree (huge controlling interests involved)? NOPE! NO GO. Please. Please?! ;-) Peter... And, since (in contrary to you) I am VERY familiar with/what DENX Systems does (I am, believe me)... U-Boot should/MUST to be freed of GOOGLE/INTEL behemoths... OK? So, I am leaving (huge interest) credits to Chromium... Which are (anyhow by politically correct) slaves to GOOGLE interests... ;-) *ARE THEY, MR. RON MINNICH???* OFF TOPIC: Got the point (I am as we speak in Belgrade, and going to play Street Ball (Ada Ciganlija) with the street people... Hey?)??? > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Alexander Couzens <lyn...@fe80.eu> wrote: > Do you tried to use coreboot (w/o FSP) + u-boot instead? Or is this out of scope? This is complete nonsense, and you all know it... Forced by INTEL to protect their own interests, in very cruel/selfich way! NO GO! Please! _______ I did NOT want to offend anybody in this list (if anybody, after all, feels offended), At The End of The Day, I do NOT care... But you all should think what I really wrote here... Please, think it through??? Thank you, Zoran Stojsavljevic _______ On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Alexander Couzens <lyn...@fe80.eu> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > we have two versions in the tree > a) fsp baytrail > b) non-fsp baytrail but with mrc.bin as meminit > > Do you tried to use coreboot (w/o FSP) + u-boot instead? Or is this out > of scope? > > Best, > lynxis > -- > Alexander Couzens > > mail: lyn...@fe80.eu > jabber: lyn...@fe80.eu > mobile: +4915123277221 > gpg: 390D CF78 8BF9 AA50 4F8F F1E2 C29E 9DA6 A0DF 8604 > > -- > coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org > https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot