I think, by "The Right Direction" he meant having the open source code instead of FSP-S blobs. 'Why do we have FSP-S' - I have the same question. Why this code must be kept closed, Intel? Open source is always better than closed, and your major competitor - AMD - would not be able to use your source code - not just because of the licenses, but because your CPUs are so different
2018-05-02 10:45 GMT+03:00 Duncan <[email protected]>: > Hello Zoran, > > Zoran Stojsavljevic: >>> Our recommendation for some time has been a mix -- arm64 client devices >>> (laptops, tablets, etc.) and ppc64el servers. With those two, you can >>> replace x86 entirely if you don't have proprietary software in your >>> environment. >> >> With all due respect, this is the discussion about Coreboot going into >> The Right Direction! This is what I actually aimed for. :-) >> > > Please clarify what "The Right Direction" is. You have confused me, as I > thought the thread was about 'Why do we have FSP-S'. > > > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
