On 12.09.19 18:42, Patrick Georgi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:20:49PM +0300, Kyösti Mälkki wrote: >> Would "some people" or these "advocates" be willing to elaborate? > I CC'd Nico and Martin because I seem to remember that we talked > about AGESA (and its quality and/or life cycle). Nico, for example, > seems to advocate scrapping AGESA to replace it with a rewrite ;-)
Ah, yes. I might have said something. When talking about AGESA ports, I most probably meant the hook-up in coreboot, not the vendorcode/. I usually don't look at the latter. I would love to see a clean rewrite and assume that I proposed this when somebody asked what could/should be done. However, I don't see it as a requirement. Also, we have much more worrisome code in the tree (e.g. KGPE-D16 and surrounding code, suffering from undefined behavior, #including of .c files etc.). Nico _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
